TOP
STORIES
 1 of 5
12 Slam Dunk March Madness Arenas of 2015
These NCAA championship arenas are high-tech with stunning video displays and on-site support from Daktronics.
 2 of 5
Netflix's 'House of Cards' Puts AMX in the White House
Producers of popular Netflix TV show contacted AMX to ensure complete accuracy in TV depiction of United States White House communications.
 3 of 5
5,000 Cute Animals and Some Tech Stuff Too
Toronto Zoo boosts digital signage and advertising real estate, supports energy conservation with weatherproof displays from SunBriteTV.
 4 of 5
The Scoop on 6 Popular Collaboration Platforms
You need to know the ins and outs of these unified communication, collaboration and huddle room solutions in order to make the best recommendation to your clients.
 5 of 5
Flashback Friday: 11 High-Tech March Madness Arenas of 2014
These NCAA championship arenas are fully equipped with stunning video displays and on-site support from Daktronics.
3 Costly Mistakes to Avoid When Deploying Enterprise-Wide Communications Solutions
Discover the approach that will pay off in the long term for your organization.

Article


Unified Communications
Unified Communications (UC) are particularly challenging within the enterprise infrastructure because of the varied application needs of users, the mobile nature of a business, or the geographic strains on the overall solution.
February 27, 2013 By Goran Velickovski

An enterprise-wide deployment of any IT solution is not an easy task.

When it comes to communications solutions, namely unified communications (UC), the difficulty is arguably even more exacerbated. Costly mistakes are avoidable if an organization is thoroughly prepared before embarking on the selection and deployment of such important technology to a business.

UC is particularly challenging within the enterprise infrastructure because of the varied application needs of users, the mobile nature of a business, or the geographic strains on the overall solution. So, it is no wonder that costly mistakes can be made and some stand out more than others when it comes to UC deployments.

First, it is extremely important that IT evaluate how all UC services (voice, video, instant messaging, collaboration, and mobile) are used in the organization. This requires due diligence and a thorough understanding of the business and its operations. Do you have to support a mobile workforce? What are the geographical demands for the solution – regionally, countrywide, and globally? These and other issues need to be thoroughly vetted before going too far down the deployment path.

One issue seen too often is organizations trying to tackle everything at once, i.e. addressing all the communications demands as an all-encompassing project. Such an approach is not recommended. Trying to deploy every communications tool at the same time will most likely create a project that will be impossible to manage, impossible to deploy, and one fraught with missed deadlines. It will ultimately be viewed as a failure. The desired goal is to arrive at an optimal end state for users and to support the overall business in a managed, well organized fashion.

Another common mistake is that during TCO/ROI modeling, IT often creates unrealistic scenarios that don’t take into account both “hard” and “soft” costs. Hard costs are easy to quantify as they are hardware, software, vendor implementation and support, PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) and network charges. Soft costs, on the other hand, are difficult to capture, but they are every bit as real and should be part of every TCO model. Included in those costs are not only things such as productivity, customer satisfaction, and resource management, but also opportunity costs associated with what the business is missing without having the new deployment to improve the operations.

One of the biggest mistakes concerns hosted solutions. During the evaluation process, don’t dismiss UCaaS (Unified Communications as a Service) as unproven, unreliable or not secure, regardless of your industry. In fact, hosted solutions should be looked at as a primary option since they require less capital expense, are quicker to implement, provide a better scale, and are easier to evaluate financially. Also, it is a misconception that on-premises and hosted solutions cannot be integrated. They actually can and are effective in meeting business needs. Hosted solution implementations are trending up and offer a lot of flexibility regardless of the industry.

Wainhouse Research predicts that UCaaS revenue will grow 47 percent from 2011 to 2015. Frost & Sullivan is even more aggressive predicting the UCaaS market will total nearly $2 billion in 2013. Deploying in whole or in part some hosted solutions in an organization is inevitable considering today’s computing environments and the distinct business advantages they offer.

For organizations pursuing hosted solutions, it is important to understand how they are delivered and supported. The ever increasing mistake IT organizations are making is they will evaluate on features and price, but fail to understand how UC will be delivered and impact their networks. Also important is evaluating the actual hosted service provider and making sure you can trust what is said and delivered. Will voice and data be delivered on the same pipe? How will the networks work together – yours and the provider’s? And, what support is there for redundancy? These and other questions are important to address, and a clear understanding of delivery and support is essential.

About the author
Goran Velickovski is Director of Engineering for West IP Communications, a provider of cloud-based communications for enterprise and mid-market companies (www.westipc.com). He can be reached at gvelickovski@westipc.com.
View all posts by Goran Velickovski
Social Bookmark or Share This
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Windows Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Evernote
  • E-mail


  • Latest
  • Blogs
  • Photos
  • Resources



Recent comments

Thanks for your comment, Kaleo. InfoComm itself is not criticizing its members for not making the $2,000 commitment.…

Posted by D. Craig MacCormack on 2015 03 23 · commented on
'Kudos to InfoComm, Shame on Its Members'.

I agree with Max.  I would rather hire someone who wants to be in our awesome industry.  I don’t…

Posted by Kaleo Lee on 2015 03 23 · commented on
'Kudos to InfoComm, Shame on Its Members'.

Thanks for your comment, Max. The headline is supposed to convey that I think it’s a good thing InfoComm…

Posted by D. Craig MacCormack on 2015 03 20 · commented on
'Kudos to InfoComm, Shame on Its Members'.

The title of this article is misleading.  Infocomm IS its members.  You can’t say shame on…

Posted by Max Kopsho on 2015 03 20 · commented on
'Kudos to InfoComm, Shame on Its Members'.