When integrators read microphone specifications, it is extremely important to understand how to interpret them. For assistance, CI turned to our sister publication ProSoundWeb, which recently posted a handy piece by Mikkel Nymand aimed at demystifying the specs.
“In most cases, the specifications can be measured or calculated in many different ways,” he writes.
“While microphone specifications provide an indication of a microphone’s electro-acoustic performance, they will not give a total appreciation of how it will sound. Specifications can detail objective information but cannot convey the subjective sonic experience.
“For example, a frequency response curve can show how faithfully the microphone will reproduce the incoming pure sinusoidal frequencies, but not how detailed, well dissolved or transparent the result will be.
Visit ProSoundWeb.com for full-length explanations by Nymand, but following are some key points:
The basis for most microphone specifications is the decibel scale. The dB scale is logarithmic and is used because of its equivalence to the way the human ear perceives changes in sound pressure.
Further, the changes in dB are smoother and more understandable than the very large numbers that might occur in pressure scales (Pascal, Newton or Bar). The dB scale states a given pressure in proportion to a reference pressure, mostly 20μPa.
The reference pressure 20μPa is chosen equal to 0 dB. Please note that 0 dB does not mean that there isn’t any sound; it only states the lower limiting sound pressure level of the average human ear’s ability to detect sounds.
The frequency response curve illustrates the microphone’s ability to transform acoustic energy into electric signals, and whether it will do so faithfully or will introduce coloration. Take care not to mistake frequency response for frequency range.
The microphone’s frequency range will only give a rough indication of which frequency area the microphone will be able to reproduce sound within a given tolerance. The frequency range is sometimes also referred to as bandwidth.
Manufacturers of professional equipment will always provide more than one frequency response curve, as it is essential to see how the microphone will respond to sound coming from different directions and in different acoustic sound fields.
The on-axis response demonstrates the microphone’s response to sound coming directly on-axis towards its diaphragm (0 degrees).
Be aware that the on-axis response may be measured from different distances, which may influence the response on directional microphones because of the proximity effect.
The diffuse field response curve will illustrate how the microphone will respond in a highly reverberant sound field.
This will be an acoustic environment where the sound has no specific direction, but where all directions are equally probable.
Good article. I’d add something to Tom’s observations:
The real “doughnut”…
Posted by Sam on 2012 05 17 · commented on'InfoComm Remains Relevant, Despite Detractors'.
Not sure about the integration of the speakers on the walls. They clash with the decor. With typical deadlines…
Posted by Jonathan on 2012 05 16 · commented on'Integrator Solves One of Jay-Z’s 99 Problems At 40/40 Club'.
I have worked with Atrion for a number of years helping them—as I do all my clients—become recognized…
Posted by Ken Lizotte on 2012 05 15 · commented on'How Atrion Executes a Service-Based Business Model'.
The amount of work and level of dedication that Atrion puts into all of their client relationships, coupled…
Posted by Kathy Saye on 2012 05 15 · commented on'How Atrion Executes a Service-Based Business Model'.